I say yeah. I love it, but I think it should be changed to compile. After seeing an onDemand demo for Forms, it’s really “left over” terminology. If we want respect from developers, I think it’s time to change it. I don’t want to, but it really makes no sense when you look at where Flash MX 2004 Professional is compared to where Flash 3 was.
Blog
-
Another Cool Thing About the Updated Flashcom Components
It adds the standard html help to your Help window in Flash MX 2004. Now I don’t have to use my damn browser. Even the information objects are in there. Co-rockin’!
-
JSAPI MovieClip Variable Definition Code
For those of you over the pain involved in defining all sub-components used in your main component at your variable definitions, you still may be suffering from all the work in actually defining them in the first place. Some forms can have many elements and toggling between your FLA to get the name of the next element, and then toggling back to your ActionScript to type it in can be a pain… specially if you decide to add or remove an element.
Therefore, here is some JSAPI code that will get all the current components of the current layer, and define them for you.
Read on…
-
Flashcom Components now work with Flash MX 2004 Babah, baaahba!
Via <a href=”http://www.actionscripthero.com/blog/archives/000177.php”>aSH</a> via <a href=”http://www.waldosmeets.com/archives/entries/929E1AA1-9B9B-9E59-30D56EFC6A1A47A2.cfm”>Waldo Smeets</a>.
<a href=”http://www.macromedia.com/support/flashcom/downloads_updaters.html”>Bust it</a>.