<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Consulting Chronicles #4: Qualifying Leads	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jessewarden.com/2010/07/consulting-chronicles-4-qualifying-leads.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jessewarden.com/2010/07/consulting-chronicles-4-qualifying-leads.html</link>
	<description>Software &#124; Fitness &#124; Gaming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:23:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: rob		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2010/07/consulting-chronicles-4-qualifying-leads.html/comment-page-1#comment-241872</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 23:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=2346#comment-241872</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Robert, I agree on the not all flex developers are good at flash. I actually work with a flash designer that will ask me to come over and code him little things like mouse overs, dynamic tweens , etc every once in a while. Even though I consider myself a Flex expert, that doesn&#039;t mean I could build an entire site in timeline view..... but I could proabably write it from scratch in actionscript just using the first couple frames. ;)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Robert, I agree on the not all flex developers are good at flash. I actually work with a flash designer that will ask me to come over and code him little things like mouse overs, dynamic tweens , etc every once in a while. Even though I consider myself a Flex expert, that doesn&#8217;t mean I could build an entire site in timeline view&#8230;.. but I could proabably write it from scratch in actionscript just using the first couple frames. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Erin		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2010/07/consulting-chronicles-4-qualifying-leads.html/comment-page-1#comment-241871</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=2346#comment-241871</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My danger keyword is &quot;just&quot; as  in &#039;I just want...&#039; or &#039;You just need to ...&#039;. 

This almost always means the client does not really know what they want or how much it should cost.

Great post.

Erin]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My danger keyword is &#8220;just&#8221; as  in &#8216;I just want&#8230;&#8217; or &#8216;You just need to &#8230;&#8217;. </p>
<p>This almost always means the client does not really know what they want or how much it should cost.</p>
<p>Great post.</p>
<p>Erin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Samuel Asher Rivello		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2010/07/consulting-chronicles-4-qualifying-leads.html/comment-page-1#comment-241870</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Asher Rivello]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=2346#comment-241870</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Fantastic read.  Your fearless merger of personal and professional personaes is admirable.

-Sam
sam [at] RivelloMultimediaConsulting [dot] com
BIZ: @srivello
LIFE/BALANCE: @nowandtherefeed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic read.  Your fearless merger of personal and professional personaes is admirable.</p>
<p>-Sam<br />
sam [at] RivelloMultimediaConsulting [dot] com<br />
BIZ: @srivello<br />
LIFE/BALANCE: @nowandtherefeed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Leo		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2010/07/consulting-chronicles-4-qualifying-leads.html/comment-page-1#comment-241869</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=2346#comment-241869</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Robert
I agree that Flex attracted a new group of developers for the Flash platform. But I think that is not so much due to Flex as a framework, but more due to Flex builder as a tool. Even if not all developers are comfortable with using Flash for authoring, I would think that any decent Flex developer is capable of doing an AS3 project with Flex/Flash Builder.

I&#039;m not saying that it&#039;s incorrect to generalize and attribute different qualities to someone calling himself Flex developer as opposed to Flash developer, or that Flex projects don&#039;t tend to require more time and skills. I&#039;m just saying that on a technical basis that generalization does not make a lot of sense.  

It becomes a bit annoying when clients insist on using Flex in cases where it does not bring any benefits to the project, simply because they have been fed with a generalization that makes them believe that using Flex automatically makes the project more serious. And if I as a developer would have limited myself to only going for Flex projects I would have missed out on some very large and interesting projects.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Robert<br />
I agree that Flex attracted a new group of developers for the Flash platform. But I think that is not so much due to Flex as a framework, but more due to Flex builder as a tool. Even if not all developers are comfortable with using Flash for authoring, I would think that any decent Flex developer is capable of doing an AS3 project with Flex/Flash Builder.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that it&#8217;s incorrect to generalize and attribute different qualities to someone calling himself Flex developer as opposed to Flash developer, or that Flex projects don&#8217;t tend to require more time and skills. I&#8217;m just saying that on a technical basis that generalization does not make a lot of sense.  </p>
<p>It becomes a bit annoying when clients insist on using Flex in cases where it does not bring any benefits to the project, simply because they have been fed with a generalization that makes them believe that using Flex automatically makes the project more serious. And if I as a developer would have limited myself to only going for Flex projects I would have missed out on some very large and interesting projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Curtis Fisher		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2010/07/consulting-chronicles-4-qualifying-leads.html/comment-page-1#comment-241868</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Curtis Fisher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=2346#comment-241868</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Excellent and many points of experience I myself have faced.  

Thanks for stating the issues so clearly...

Curtis]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent and many points of experience I myself have faced.  </p>
<p>Thanks for stating the issues so clearly&#8230;</p>
<p>Curtis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
