<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: What I Learned From Microsoft MIX 2010	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jessewarden.com/2010/03/what-i-learned-from-microsoft-mix-2010.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jessewarden.com/2010/03/what-i-learned-from-microsoft-mix-2010.html</link>
	<description>Software &#124; Fitness &#124; Gaming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:44:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: JesterXL		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2010/03/what-i-learned-from-microsoft-mix-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-229912</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JesterXL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=2106#comment-229912</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@GTRoberts Negative, it&#039;s hovering around 52 - 55%.  Quote from the keynote:

&quot;...approaching 60%...&quot;

http://jessewarden.com/archives/mix2010/

Yes, I know it&#039;s a slight technicality, but if it were EXACTLY 60% or above right now, there&#039;d be a certain large video website for a large company in New York I wouldn&#039;t have had the opportunity to work on.

And yes, I recognize, and am happy for, the fact that it will reach 60% soon and surpass it.

My point is that &quot;approaching&quot; and &quot;at or above&quot; are huge differentiators in large sales negotiations... and 60 is the magic number to get to.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@GTRoberts Negative, it&#8217;s hovering around 52 &#8211; 55%.  Quote from the keynote:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;approaching 60%&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://jessewarden.com/archives/mix2010/" rel="ugc">http://jessewarden.com/archives/mix2010/</a></p>
<p>Yes, I know it&#8217;s a slight technicality, but if it were EXACTLY 60% or above right now, there&#8217;d be a certain large video website for a large company in New York I wouldn&#8217;t have had the opportunity to work on.</p>
<p>And yes, I recognize, and am happy for, the fact that it will reach 60% soon and surpass it.</p>
<p>My point is that &#8220;approaching&#8221; and &#8220;at or above&#8221; are huge differentiators in large sales negotiations&#8230; and 60 is the magic number to get to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Borek		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2010/03/what-i-learned-from-microsoft-mix-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-229580</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Borek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=2106#comment-229580</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Phillip, Flash Player 10.1 and Silverlight 4 are pretty on par feature-wise and if you add the fact that MS is advancing Silverlight about 10 times faster than Adobe does Flash Player, I think Adobe has a lot to worry about.

The tools are more important that you make it sound - if they weren&#039;t it wouldn&#039;t matter if you developed your Flex apps in Flex Builder or in Notepad - but it does. Better tools make you more productive (lower time to market etc.), your applications less buggy etc. which are all things the end users appreciate.

And just in case you wonder, I am a full time Flex developer :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phillip, Flash Player 10.1 and Silverlight 4 are pretty on par feature-wise and if you add the fact that MS is advancing Silverlight about 10 times faster than Adobe does Flash Player, I think Adobe has a lot to worry about.</p>
<p>The tools are more important that you make it sound &#8211; if they weren&#8217;t it wouldn&#8217;t matter if you developed your Flex apps in Flex Builder or in Notepad &#8211; but it does. Better tools make you more productive (lower time to market etc.), your applications less buggy etc. which are all things the end users appreciate.</p>
<p>And just in case you wonder, I am a full time Flex developer :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: GTRoberts		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2010/03/what-i-learned-from-microsoft-mix-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-229552</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GTRoberts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=2106#comment-229552</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jesse - you might want to re-adjust your post, Silverlight is *already* at 60% base ;-) This was said in the day 1 keynote.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse &#8211; you might want to re-adjust your post, Silverlight is *already* at 60% base ;-) This was said in the day 1 keynote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Phillip Kerman		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2010/03/what-i-learned-from-microsoft-mix-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-229379</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phillip Kerman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=2106#comment-229379</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think I&#039;ve also come to the realization that (for most) Silverlight is just an offering to .NET junkies who would never consider ActionScript.  It&#039;s hilarious hearing stuff like how &quot;the next version of Silverlight will have...&quot; (something that&#039;s been in Flash for years).   Butâ€”in my opinionâ€”many developers choose one technology over the other based on their experienceâ€”which (again in my opinion) is nuts.  Sure, I would opt for Flash/ActionScript partially because I know itâ€”but I donâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />t recall ANY of my customers saying â€œwe donâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />t care so much about the end productâ€”we just want you to be happy in the tools youâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />re usingâ€.  That just doesnâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />t happen.  Perhaps if faced with a more expensive project theyâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />d care to choose the one that I can do more cheaplyâ€”but thatâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />s rare.  Also, you could argue one technology is better for maintenanceâ€¦ but still, when it comes down to it â€œclientsâ€ (ultimately meaning â€œend usersâ€) could care less what technology is involved as long as the end product is great.   Thatâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />s why Silverlight is a success for the Olympics (also due to the fact it worked).  But itâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />s also why the really cool stuff will continue to come from Flashâ€”provided they stay significantly ahead with new technologies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;ve also come to the realization that (for most) Silverlight is just an offering to .NET junkies who would never consider ActionScript.  It&#8217;s hilarious hearing stuff like how &#8220;the next version of Silverlight will have&#8230;&#8221; (something that&#8217;s been in Flash for years).   Butâ€”in my opinionâ€”many developers choose one technology over the other based on their experienceâ€”which (again in my opinion) is nuts.  Sure, I would opt for Flash/ActionScript partially because I know itâ€”but I donâ€™t recall ANY of my customers saying â€œwe donâ€™t care so much about the end productâ€”we just want you to be happy in the tools youâ€™re usingâ€.  That just doesnâ€™t happen.  Perhaps if faced with a more expensive project theyâ€™d care to choose the one that I can do more cheaplyâ€”but thatâ€™s rare.  Also, you could argue one technology is better for maintenanceâ€¦ but still, when it comes down to it â€œclientsâ€ (ultimately meaning â€œend usersâ€) could care less what technology is involved as long as the end product is great.   Thatâ€™s why Silverlight is a success for the Olympics (also due to the fact it worked).  But itâ€™s also why the really cool stuff will continue to come from Flashâ€”provided they stay significantly ahead with new technologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brent Bonet		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2010/03/what-i-learned-from-microsoft-mix-2010.html/comment-page-1#comment-229376</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Bonet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=2106#comment-229376</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree with the &quot;they both rock&quot; sentiment. While it&#039;s been nearly a year since I&#039;ve dealt with Silverlight (v2) I&#039;m looking forward to having a chance to work with it again. At this point you&#039;re correct about installed base of the plugin which has caused me to stick with Flash/Flex/AIR for now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the &#8220;they both rock&#8221; sentiment. While it&#8217;s been nearly a year since I&#8217;ve dealt with Silverlight (v2) I&#8217;m looking forward to having a chance to work with it again. At this point you&#8217;re correct about installed base of the plugin which has caused me to stick with Flash/Flex/AIR for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
