<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: E4X Doesn&#8217;t Suck	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jessewarden.com/2006/05/e4x-doesnt-suck.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jessewarden.com/2006/05/e4x-doesnt-suck.html</link>
	<description>Software &#124; Fitness &#124; Gaming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 15:02:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Schmalle		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2006/05/e4x-doesnt-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-3530</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Schmalle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 15:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=1014#comment-3530</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&gt;  serialized ActionScript objects.

Hey I love remoting to, I use AMFPHP BUT... the transfer size! 

Due to the way my algorithm is in the documenter, I was FORCED to use XML. THe returned data was just to big. It was something I could not page either.

For the rest of the project I use AMF. But, this app will be a Beta Apollo app ;-)

I also had to use HTTPService for loading those 4000 line Adobe framework classes ;-)

Everything else is AMF though. Is it AMFPHP that just has the return data limit or AMF in general?

I just have to say, I have been following you for a long time and you have helped me out tremendously, just like a lot of other people.

Face it Jesse, when you are a genious, you are bipolor, just manager it better. The depression phase you should turn into vacation. This is what I do now ;-)

Peace, Mike


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>  serialized ActionScript objects.</p>
<p>Hey I love remoting to, I use AMFPHP BUT&#8230; the transfer size! </p>
<p>Due to the way my algorithm is in the documenter, I was FORCED to use XML. THe returned data was just to big. It was something I could not page either.</p>
<p>For the rest of the project I use AMF. But, this app will be a Beta Apollo app ;-)</p>
<p>I also had to use HTTPService for loading those 4000 line Adobe framework classes ;-)</p>
<p>Everything else is AMF though. Is it AMFPHP that just has the return data limit or AMF in general?</p>
<p>I just have to say, I have been following you for a long time and you have helped me out tremendously, just like a lot of other people.</p>
<p>Face it Jesse, when you are a genious, you are bipolor, just manager it better. The depression phase you should turn into vacation. This is what I do now ;-)</p>
<p>Peace, Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JesterXL		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2006/05/e4x-doesnt-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-3529</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JesterXL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=1014#comment-3529</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hah!  Good one.  The title is E4X &lt;b&gt;Doesn&#039;t&lt;/b&gt; Suck.  I&#039;m still learning the syntax, but it&#039;s really hard to get up the motivation to do when you spend 100% of your day doing nothing but dealing with data access from ColdFusion as nice serialized ActionScript objects.  XML, to me, was a thing from the past; I just don&#039;t get the opportunity to get passed raw data anymore.

In the case of dealing with Ruby on Rails, I suddenly was back at square 1 again; there isn&#039;t a Remoting for Ruby yet, so I&#039;m stuck using XML, thus, I get the learn the syntax.  I&#039;m sure there is a lot more like the above; I know Darron Schall was all over it, I just couldn&#039;t get excited about parsing XML.  Just give me the frikin&#039; data, I shouldn&#039;t have to parse anything!

...but when you have to, I&#039;m seeing how E4X is cool.

As far as the site colors, yeah man, it&#039;ll take all weekend to implement this new design.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah!  Good one.  The title is E4X <b>Doesn&#8217;t</b> Suck.  I&#8217;m still learning the syntax, but it&#8217;s really hard to get up the motivation to do when you spend 100% of your day doing nothing but dealing with data access from ColdFusion as nice serialized ActionScript objects.  XML, to me, was a thing from the past; I just don&#8217;t get the opportunity to get passed raw data anymore.</p>
<p>In the case of dealing with Ruby on Rails, I suddenly was back at square 1 again; there isn&#8217;t a Remoting for Ruby yet, so I&#8217;m stuck using XML, thus, I get the learn the syntax.  I&#8217;m sure there is a lot more like the above; I know Darron Schall was all over it, I just couldn&#8217;t get excited about parsing XML.  Just give me the frikin&#8217; data, I shouldn&#8217;t have to parse anything!</p>
<p>&#8230;but when you have to, I&#8217;m seeing how E4X is cool.</p>
<p>As far as the site colors, yeah man, it&#8217;ll take all weekend to implement this new design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Schmalle		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2006/05/e4x-doesnt-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-3528</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Schmalle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=1014#comment-3528</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jesse,

This old dog found new tricks with e4x.

I have created an as3/xmxml documenter entirly in as3 Flex2. I only use php for file access.

For the recursive directory parsing I send back XML.

like;
&lt;pre&gt;&#060;root&#062;
 &#060;directory&#062;
   &#060;file&#062;
    &#060;directory&#062;
      &#060;file&#062; ...... etc.&lt;/pre&gt;

When I first started looking at this data I siad, oh yeah what was the recursive loop I need to get all my file nodes.

Well after further investigation, in e4x it&#039;s this simple.

var allFiles:XMLList = xml..files;

Sorry man, you can&#039;t say that sucks.

Peace, Mike

BTW, your code colors are blending into the white code background :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse,</p>
<p>This old dog found new tricks with e4x.</p>
<p>I have created an as3/xmxml documenter entirly in as3 Flex2. I only use php for file access.</p>
<p>For the recursive directory parsing I send back XML.</p>
<p>like;</p>
<pre>&lt;root&gt;
 &lt;directory&gt;
   &lt;file&gt;
    &lt;directory&gt;
      &lt;file&gt; ...... etc.</pre>
<p>When I first started looking at this data I siad, oh yeah what was the recursive loop I need to get all my file nodes.</p>
<p>Well after further investigation, in e4x it&#8217;s this simple.</p>
<p>var allFiles:XMLList = xml..files;</p>
<p>Sorry man, you can&#8217;t say that sucks.</p>
<p>Peace, Mike</p>
<p>BTW, your code colors are blending into the white code background :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JesterXL		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2006/05/e4x-doesnt-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-3527</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JesterXL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 07:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=1014#comment-3527</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[After a refresh, she works good.  Man, that thing is fast... that sure seems like a lot of data going really really fast!  I might have to ease up on my XML bashing after seeing that.

Dude, if someone ports TMC to RoR, blog that shiz!  That&#039;d be insane to have a nice VO coding model like that &lt;b&gt;WITHOUT&lt;/b&gt; Factories!  :: drools ::]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a refresh, she works good.  Man, that thing is fast&#8230; that sure seems like a lot of data going really really fast!  I might have to ease up on my XML bashing after seeing that.</p>
<p>Dude, if someone ports TMC to RoR, blog that shiz!  That&#8217;d be insane to have a nice VO coding model like that <b>WITHOUT</b> Factories!  :: drools ::</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Harris Reynolds		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2006/05/e4x-doesnt-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-3526</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harris Reynolds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 07:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=1014#comment-3526</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[BTW... we&#039;re talking about doing a Ruby/RoR port of WebORB at &lt;a href=&quot;http://themidnightcoders.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TMC&lt;/a&gt;.  Then you would have your... 

service.saveProject ( projectVO );

...method call in Ruby.  Now *that* would be sweet. :-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW&#8230; we&#8217;re talking about doing a Ruby/RoR port of WebORB at <a href="http://themidnightcoders.com/" rel="nofollow">TMC</a>.  Then you would have your&#8230; </p>
<p>service.saveProject ( projectVO );</p>
<p>&#8230;method call in Ruby.  Now *that* would be sweet. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
