<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: W3C Starts New Groups for Web API&#8217;s &#038; RIA Standards	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jessewarden.com/2005/11/w3c-starts-new-groups-for-web-apis-ria-standards.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jessewarden.com/2005/11/w3c-starts-new-groups-for-web-apis-ria-standards.html</link>
	<description>Software &#124; Fitness &#124; Gaming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:21:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: karl dubost		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2005/11/w3c-starts-new-groups-for-web-apis-ria-standards.html/comment-page-1#comment-3113</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[karl dubost]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=921#comment-3113</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hmmm It seems you are mixing a few things. 

There are incentives to have XML interfaces languages. For example, XUL, XBL are examples. So when there&#039;s a good practice on a topic, it&#039;s good to standardize it then there&#039;s a clear reference for future use &lt;b&gt;and&lt;/b&gt; more a Royalty Free reference to implement by &lt;b&gt;anyone&lt;/b&gt;

Another aspect is AJAX like applications or XMLHttpRequest, which has no specification for now. Most of the development are a reverse engineering of the initial feature implemented in IE. Having a well defined specification for this will promote interoperability and then people will be able to develop applications in a clear environment.

Hope it helps to understand.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm It seems you are mixing a few things. </p>
<p>There are incentives to have XML interfaces languages. For example, XUL, XBL are examples. So when there&#8217;s a good practice on a topic, it&#8217;s good to standardize it then there&#8217;s a clear reference for future use <b>and</b> more a Royalty Free reference to implement by <b>anyone</b></p>
<p>Another aspect is AJAX like applications or XMLHttpRequest, which has no specification for now. Most of the development are a reverse engineering of the initial feature implemented in IE. Having a well defined specification for this will promote interoperability and then people will be able to develop applications in a clear environment.</p>
<p>Hope it helps to understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JesterXL		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2005/11/w3c-starts-new-groups-for-web-apis-ria-standards.html/comment-page-1#comment-3112</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JesterXL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=921#comment-3112</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Roger that, updated entry.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger that, updated entry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Manish Jethani		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2005/11/w3c-starts-new-groups-for-web-apis-ria-standards.html/comment-page-1#comment-3111</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manish Jethani]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=921#comment-3111</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[hey, my old website is dead, so my URL for now is this:
http://www.livejournal.com/users/mannu]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, my old website is dead, so my URL for now is this:<br />
<a href="http://www.livejournal.com/users/mannu" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.livejournal.com/users/mannu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
