<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Halo 2, Half-Life 2, and Gaming Engines	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jessewarden.com/2004/11/halo-2-half-life-2-and-gaming-engines.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jessewarden.com/2004/11/halo-2-half-life-2-and-gaming-engines.html</link>
	<description>Software &#124; Fitness &#124; Gaming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:06:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Seth Turetsky		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2004/11/halo-2-half-life-2-and-gaming-engines.html/comment-page-1#comment-2177</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seth Turetsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=670#comment-2177</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I could not agree more on all of this.

Doom got the best reactions out of me, ie jumping out of my chair and hiding
under my bed, but it ran super-thin super-fast.  It&#039;s generally just room
after room where one or two easily defeatable monsters spawn out of nowhere.
After awhile, the scare factor is gone and it&#039;s just a no-strategy bulletfest.

Halo 2 = Halo 1 + dual weapons + ability to pull baddies off vehicles.  While
a good FPS for the xbox, I&#039;m not sure if that says a whole lot.

I just got Half-life 2, and I really like it the most of the 3, but
disappointed if it is really that short.  The physics are really neat,
throwing an object into a pile of others is suprisingly entertaining.  Little
puzzles where you interact with picking objects up is a nice addition in a
fps.  As for multiplayer, Counterstrike: source looks really nice, too bad I
get owned in it by 10 year olds.  A Half-life2 multiplayer would be very nice
or even a coop play against the pc would be really fun.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not agree more on all of this.</p>
<p>Doom got the best reactions out of me, ie jumping out of my chair and hiding<br />
under my bed, but it ran super-thin super-fast.  It&#8217;s generally just room<br />
after room where one or two easily defeatable monsters spawn out of nowhere.<br />
After awhile, the scare factor is gone and it&#8217;s just a no-strategy bulletfest.</p>
<p>Halo 2 = Halo 1 + dual weapons + ability to pull baddies off vehicles.  While<br />
a good FPS for the xbox, I&#8217;m not sure if that says a whole lot.</p>
<p>I just got Half-life 2, and I really like it the most of the 3, but<br />
disappointed if it is really that short.  The physics are really neat,<br />
throwing an object into a pile of others is suprisingly entertaining.  Little<br />
puzzles where you interact with picking objects up is a nice addition in a<br />
fps.  As for multiplayer, Counterstrike: source looks really nice, too bad I<br />
get owned in it by 10 year olds.  A Half-life2 multiplayer would be very nice<br />
or even a coop play against the pc would be really fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
