Comments on: SWF + ASCII -> CVS = OT OT OT https://jessewarden.com/2004/06/swf-ascii-cvs-ot-ot-ot.html Software | Fitness | Gaming Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:45:32 +0000 hourly 1 By: leland https://jessewarden.com/2004/06/swf-ascii-cvs-ot-ot-ot.html/comment-page-1#comment-1842 Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:45:32 +0000 http://jessewarden.com/?p=560#comment-1842 i agree about checking swfs in. some of my clients don’t have flash developers on staff, so it’s a good idea and a time saver to keep the latest swfs with the project. i normally keep them in a deliverables or exports directory inside of the main project directory so they are seperate from the source.

i have always checked them in as binary.

]]> By: JesterXL https://jessewarden.com/2004/06/swf-ascii-cvs-ot-ot-ot.html/comment-page-1#comment-1841 Fri, 25 Jun 2004 18:57:33 +0000 http://jessewarden.com/?p=560#comment-1841 Java guys don’t touch Flash in our dept, so I have to do the build for them.

]]> By: ericd https://jessewarden.com/2004/06/swf-ascii-cvs-ot-ot-ot.html/comment-page-1#comment-1840 Fri, 25 Jun 2004 18:25:48 +0000 http://jessewarden.com/?p=560#comment-1840 Why check SWFs in at all? Check the FLAs in as binary, everything else as ASCII and have people build the SWFs as needed/part of a build system.

]]>