<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Central: Slow Burn = Lack of Research &#038; Vision	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jessewarden.com/2004/03/central-slow-burn-lack-of-research-vision.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jessewarden.com/2004/03/central-slow-burn-lack-of-research-vision.html</link>
	<description>Software &#124; Fitness &#124; Gaming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 13:28:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott Barnes		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2004/03/central-slow-burn-lack-of-research-vision.html/comment-page-1#comment-1448</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Barnes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 13:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=454#comment-1448</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I just found a CD with one of the early versions of ICQ (late 1990s). So I am er33t now too :)

Yeah, they haven&#039;t gone &quot;Full version&quot; probably due to some license / Trade Mark crap or something like that.. no idea.

Point is though, you understood it was Beta, and with all Beta software, all bets are off. Why? its a prototype and you know this as a developer especially. It stops all bullshit remarks like &quot;its sooo buggy&quot; in its track as the end reply is &quot;Dah, mofo, its BETA.. you know, BETA, VHS, CD, DVD, Holigram... see a fricken pattern emerging??&quot; ...

I gotta lay off the fizzy drinks.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found a CD with one of the early versions of ICQ (late 1990s). So I am er33t now too :)</p>
<p>Yeah, they haven&#8217;t gone &#8220;Full version&#8221; probably due to some license / Trade Mark crap or something like that.. no idea.</p>
<p>Point is though, you understood it was Beta, and with all Beta software, all bets are off. Why? its a prototype and you know this as a developer especially. It stops all bullshit remarks like &#8220;its sooo buggy&#8221; in its track as the end reply is &#8220;Dah, mofo, its BETA.. you know, BETA, VHS, CD, DVD, Holigram&#8230; see a fricken pattern emerging??&#8221; &#8230;</p>
<p>I gotta lay off the fizzy drinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JesterXL		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2004/03/central-slow-burn-lack-of-research-vision.html/comment-page-1#comment-1447</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JesterXL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=454#comment-1447</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ICQ was one of the first IM clients I ever used.  I have a number around 500,000 if that tells you how early I adopted (OH, your soo frikin&#039; neat, Jesse, cause you got a low ICQ #; can I hang with you and be neat LiKEYOU!!!!???).

I don&#039;t think I ever downloaded and installed a program by them that wasn&#039;t &quot;beta&quot;.  Seriously, every release had 5.4.6.1beta.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ICQ was one of the first IM clients I ever used.  I have a number around 500,000 if that tells you how early I adopted (OH, your soo frikin&#8217; neat, Jesse, cause you got a low ICQ #; can I hang with you and be neat LiKEYOU!!!!???).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I ever downloaded and installed a program by them that wasn&#8217;t &#8220;beta&#8221;.  Seriously, every release had 5.4.6.1beta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott Barnes		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2004/03/central-slow-burn-lack-of-research-vision.html/comment-page-1#comment-1446</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Barnes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 00:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=454#comment-1446</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Its very simple on Macromedias part, when CENTRAL first loads, it should be branded clearly and visually consistent &quot;DEVELOPER RELEASE&quot;.

At the moment, if you aren&#039;t in the Macromedia Blog-World, and you load Central, it does look like a finished product. Of course, if you click on the &quot;About Central&quot; under the help menu, you see &quot;Developer Release&quot; tucked nicely in the far right.

NOT GoOOd enough.

I say this, as it gives fuel for monkeys like this writer, to sit back and publically cain the shit out of what is a good product concept. While we can cain him ONLINE in various pockets of the Internet (Blogs etc), the end public will look at the article as if this guy carries enough IT smarts to be taken at face value.

I think while stuffs being worked out with Central, it should be branded more as a &quot;Beta&quot; mode, as this will reduce a lot of peoples perception(s) as you can always hide behind the &quot;oh well, thats in beta, we&#039;ll fix that&quot; and you will get more of a pro-active acceptance of situations like the above, than if you release it as is now with bugs/problems.

Its worked for a lot of projects, namely ICQ, its got bugs, and its annoying, but its still in &quot;beta&quot; so to speak, and a lot of people accept that.... JUST DON&#039;T DRAG IT OUT for years/months....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its very simple on Macromedias part, when CENTRAL first loads, it should be branded clearly and visually consistent &#8220;DEVELOPER RELEASE&#8221;.</p>
<p>At the moment, if you aren&#8217;t in the Macromedia Blog-World, and you load Central, it does look like a finished product. Of course, if you click on the &#8220;About Central&#8221; under the help menu, you see &#8220;Developer Release&#8221; tucked nicely in the far right.</p>
<p>NOT GoOOd enough.</p>
<p>I say this, as it gives fuel for monkeys like this writer, to sit back and publically cain the shit out of what is a good product concept. While we can cain him ONLINE in various pockets of the Internet (Blogs etc), the end public will look at the article as if this guy carries enough IT smarts to be taken at face value.</p>
<p>I think while stuffs being worked out with Central, it should be branded more as a &#8220;Beta&#8221; mode, as this will reduce a lot of peoples perception(s) as you can always hide behind the &#8220;oh well, thats in beta, we&#8217;ll fix that&#8221; and you will get more of a pro-active acceptance of situations like the above, than if you release it as is now with bugs/problems.</p>
<p>Its worked for a lot of projects, namely ICQ, its got bugs, and its annoying, but its still in &#8220;beta&#8221; so to speak, and a lot of people accept that&#8230;. JUST DON&#8217;T DRAG IT OUT for years/months&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LordAlex Leon		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2004/03/central-slow-burn-lack-of-research-vision.html/comment-page-1#comment-1445</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LordAlex Leon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 21:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=454#comment-1445</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I second Jester on that. I saw another article maybe like a couple of weeks ago, in a news site they said use flash only for animation when necesary. Just as in here the Author did not know what the hell he was talking about.

The worst of all is that on that article as well as CNET one there is no place for anyone to leave a comment, or opinion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second Jester on that. I saw another article maybe like a couple of weeks ago, in a news site they said use flash only for animation when necesary. Just as in here the Author did not know what the hell he was talking about.</p>
<p>The worst of all is that on that article as well as CNET one there is no place for anyone to leave a comment, or opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JesterXL		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2004/03/central-slow-burn-lack-of-research-vision.html/comment-page-1#comment-1444</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JesterXL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 20:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=454#comment-1444</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Absolutely, I agree.

However, as a Central proponent, I feel it is my responsibility to counter any mis-interpretation of the technology, and hopefully educate people on what is accurate as well as what is my subjective opinion, hopefully both positive.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely, I agree.</p>
<p>However, as a Central proponent, I feel it is my responsibility to counter any mis-interpretation of the technology, and hopefully educate people on what is accurate as well as what is my subjective opinion, hopefully both positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
