Comments on: What in Flashcom do you want?

By: JesterXL

JesterXL — Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:34:44 +0000

Cool, I use these comments to let my editor know what the community wants, so I’ll see what I can do about getting both in. Hoping both ideas get approved, and I’ll ask about putting the 2nd in edition 3.

Thanks!

By: desmond_dekker

desmond_dekker — Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:10:36 +0000

Hi,
i think both of them are interesting topics. Usually, developers aren’t happy with Flogger,( as far as i have read in flashcom list, or forums ) so, an article about that , about a different flogger will be interesting. ( it has my vote )

By the other hand, remote Shared Objects vs XMLSocket sounds like a pretty article, so…
Could it be flogger in the next Mx journal and RSO vs XMLSockets on one another??

je je anyone of this will be read with a lot of concentration by me.

( sorry for my really bad english )

By: alessandro

alessandro — Sat, 13 Sep 2003 00:07:18 +0000

something on persistence… maybe a framework for transparently syncing local and remote SOs for sometimes connected apps a la central

or a server-side push application that broadcasts locally generated flvs/streams to a net of neighboring servers, to create that cool fault-resistant post-nuclear tv/object network

By: Brian

Brian — Fri, 12 Sep 2003 20:45:40 +0000

I second that!

By: Erik Bianchi

Erik Bianchi — Fri, 12 Sep 2003 20:02:44 +0000

I would read an article about Remote Shared Objects vs XMLSockets. Perhaps compare the 2 with code examples then show where Flashcom really shines.

It would also be nice to see performance comparisons as well.