<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Flashcom Installation Woes	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jessewarden.com/2003/02/flashcom-installation-woes.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jessewarden.com/2003/02/flashcom-installation-woes.html</link>
	<description>Software &#124; Fitness &#124; Gaming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2003 20:43:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2003/02/flashcom-installation-woes.html/comment-page-1#comment-48</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2003 20:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=24#comment-48</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hmm.. I think it&#039;d be cool if it gave you the option to not install the authoring components, but still install the reference panel stuff maybe? At least the stuff that isn&#039;t related to the components, like the netStream ref and code hints, etc.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.. I think it&#8217;d be cool if it gave you the option to not install the authoring components, but still install the reference panel stuff maybe? At least the stuff that isn&#8217;t related to the components, like the netStream ref and code hints, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jesterxl		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2003/02/flashcom-installation-woes.html/comment-page-1#comment-47</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jesterxl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=24#comment-47</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well blow me down...

If you don&#039;t have an inetpub, then... where does the flashcom directory get installed?  I mean, honestly, I didn&#039;t do a search, but maybe I should have?  I just assumed if you didn&#039;t have a webserver installed, you couldn&#039;t have application directories.  Time to refer to Kevin Towes&#039; book, eh?

Typical user error, I guess.  Still, how does it work without app directories (or were they there and I just didn&#039;t look for them)?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well blow me down&#8230;</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t have an inetpub, then&#8230; where does the flashcom directory get installed?  I mean, honestly, I didn&#8217;t do a search, but maybe I should have?  I just assumed if you didn&#8217;t have a webserver installed, you couldn&#8217;t have application directories.  Time to refer to Kevin Towes&#8217; book, eh?</p>
<p>Typical user error, I guess.  Still, how does it work without app directories (or were they there and I just didn&#8217;t look for them)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Peldi		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2003/02/flashcom-installation-woes.html/comment-page-1#comment-46</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peldi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2003 11:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=24#comment-46</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[FlashCom is not related to a web server, it doesn&#039;t need one (you can serve your SWFs off of another machine, and most production environments do), so why should it throw an error if you don&#039;t have IIS installed?

Plus, if you choose not to install the authoring component, it seems only natural that the installer won&#039;t install them.

I mean, I&#039;m all for constructive criticism and I believe that the installer could be improved, but I guess I don&#039;t see your points in this post.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FlashCom is not related to a web server, it doesn&#8217;t need one (you can serve your SWFs off of another machine, and most production environments do), so why should it throw an error if you don&#8217;t have IIS installed?</p>
<p>Plus, if you choose not to install the authoring component, it seems only natural that the installer won&#8217;t install them.</p>
<p>I mean, I&#8217;m all for constructive criticism and I believe that the installer could be improved, but I guess I don&#8217;t see your points in this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Peldi		</title>
		<link>https://jessewarden.com/2003/02/flashcom-installation-woes.html/comment-page-1#comment-45</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peldi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2003 07:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=24#comment-45</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I believe the default installation for the flashcom/application folder (the one that contains your app folders), if no web server is found during installation, is C:\Program Files\Macromedia\Flash Communication MX\flashcom\applications\, and if I remember correctly it says so in one of the installer screens.

I guess you&#039;re like me and breeze through installers without reading too much...&quot;next! next! next! install it already!&quot; ;)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the default installation for the flashcom/application folder (the one that contains your app folders), if no web server is found during installation, is C:\Program Files\Macromedia\Flash Communication MX\flashcom\applications\, and if I remember correctly it says so in one of the installer screens.</p>
<p>I guess you&#8217;re like me and breeze through installers without reading too much&#8230;&#8221;next! next! next! install it already!&#8221; ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
