http://jessewarden.com/2007/09/no-excludexml-in-flash-cs3-for-as3-solution-via-bridge-pattern.html A blog on software development, technology, games & movies. Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:52:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 http://jessewarden.com/2007/09/no-excludexml-in-flash-cs3-for-as3-solution-via-bridge-pattern.html#comment-112581 andar909 Mon, 11 Aug 2008 04:18:47 +0000 http://jessewarden.com/2007/09/no-excludexml-in-flash-cs3-for-as3-solution-via-bridge-pattern.html#comment-112581 hi, andar here, i just read your post. i like very much. agree to you, sir. hi, andar here, i just read your post. i like very much. agree to you, sir.

]]> http://jessewarden.com/2007/09/no-excludexml-in-flash-cs3-for-as3-solution-via-bridge-pattern.html#comment-92362 manotosh Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:39:53 +0000 http://jessewarden.com/2007/09/no-excludexml-in-flash-cs3-for-as3-solution-via-bridge-pattern.html#comment-92362 I have been searching for solution to exclude class using flash 9 IDE, but realised _exclude is removed. I then used flex library projects to create code library and use it in flash, I took the advantage of refering other library projects as library path to do the type checking of clases which I dont want to include. Things works fine till I realised that the file size of exported swc form flex is much larger than flash exported swc. I created one single class without any composition or inheritance and compiled both from flash and from flex libray projects, the flash exported file size is 11k where as flex exported swc size is 20k. Does anybody know what extra goes into flex swc? I plan to use flex as a code compiler to take the advantage of excluding classes. Does anybodu know any other solution? I have been searching for solution to exclude class using flash 9 IDE, but realised _exclude is removed. I then used flex library projects to create code library and use it in flash, I took the advantage of refering other library projects as library path to do the type checking of clases which I dont want to include. Things works fine till I realised that the file size of exported swc form flex is much larger than flash exported swc. I created one single class without any composition or inheritance and compiled both from flash and from flex libray projects, the flash exported file size is 11k where as flex exported swc size is 20k. Does anybody know what extra goes into flex swc? I plan to use flex as a code compiler to take the advantage of excluding classes. Does anybodu know any other solution?

]]> http://jessewarden.com/2007/09/no-excludexml-in-flash-cs3-for-as3-solution-via-bridge-pattern.html#comment-82809 tonypee Fri, 09 May 2008 04:23:53 +0000 http://jessewarden.com/2007/09/no-excludexml-in-flash-cs3-for-as3-solution-via-bridge-pattern.html#comment-82809 sorry i was meaning to link to: http://blog.touchmypixel.com/archives/16 sorry i was meaning to link to: http://blog.touchmypixel.com/archives/16

]]> http://jessewarden.com/2007/09/no-excludexml-in-flash-cs3-for-as3-solution-via-bridge-pattern.html#comment-82807 tonypee Fri, 09 May 2008 04:20:44 +0000 http://jessewarden.com/2007/09/no-excludexml-in-flash-cs3-for-as3-solution-via-bridge-pattern.html#comment-82807 We've been using a more simple method of creating empy 'placeholder' classes that get replaced. check out: http://blog.touchmypixel.com/archives/15 We’ve been using a more simple method of creating empy ‘placeholder’ classes that get replaced. check out: http://blog.touchmypixel.com/archives/15

]]> http://jessewarden.com/2007/09/no-excludexml-in-flash-cs3-for-as3-solution-via-bridge-pattern.html#comment-68924 ex animo » Blog Archive » Flash CS3 and _exclude.xml Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:18:26 +0000 http://jessewarden.com/2007/09/no-excludexml-in-flash-cs3-for-as3-solution-via-bridge-pattern.html#comment-68924 [...] need to prevent PointlessThing from being compiled into “example.swf.” We could use the bridge pattern, but then we’d have to create new interfaces and we still wouldn’t be completely rid of [...] […] need to prevent PointlessThing from being compiled into “example.swf.” We could use the bridge pattern, but then we’d have to create new interfaces and we still wouldn’t be completely rid of […]

]]>