<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordML: Could Powerpoint be next?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jessewarden.com/2003/08/wordml-could-powerpoint-be-next.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jessewarden.com/2003/08/wordml-could-powerpoint-be-next.html</link>
	<description>A blog on software development, technology, games &#038; movies.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 07:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://jessewarden.com/2003/08/wordml-could-powerpoint-be-next.html#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2003 01:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=235#comment-722</guid>
		<description>Don't get your hopes up :) Just like everything else they (M$) do, they'll be sure to muck up the xml with some form of wacky proprietary markup or syntax. Just look what frontpage used to do to html (I haven't seen the latest version, maybe they're over this?).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get your hopes up <img src='http://jessewarden.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Just like everything else they (M$) do, they&#8217;ll be sure to muck up the xml with some form of wacky proprietary markup or syntax. Just look what frontpage used to do to html (I haven&#8217;t seen the latest version, maybe they&#8217;re over this?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melvyn Song</title>
		<link>http://jessewarden.com/2003/08/wordml-could-powerpoint-be-next.html#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>Melvyn Song</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2003 03:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=235#comment-721</guid>
		<description>I wont be surprise if they actually have powerpoint with XML. Remember the app we were talking in. It was using XML. Most of my applications that i am creating at the moment is using XML to drive it because it allows me to change (especially since clients are so fond of changging colors, text etc) It doesnt make sence to get into the fla files and publish it again.

My few cents worth.

Melvyn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wont be surprise if they actually have powerpoint with XML. Remember the app we were talking in. It was using XML. Most of my applications that i am creating at the moment is using XML to drive it because it allows me to change (especially since clients are so fond of changging colors, text etc) It doesnt make sence to get into the fla files and publish it again.</p>
<p>My few cents worth.</p>
<p>Melvyn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nav</title>
		<link>http://jessewarden.com/2003/08/wordml-could-powerpoint-be-next.html#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>Nav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2003 22:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=235#comment-720</guid>
		<description>AFAIK, PowerPoint is the only Office format that does not have a XML equivalent...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AFAIK, PowerPoint is the only Office format that does not have a XML equivalent&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
